Login | Users Online: 33724  
Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size   
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2006  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 55-64

Patterns of walking for transport and exercise: A novel application of time use data


1 Department of Exercise and Wellness, Arizona State University East, Mesa, Arizona, USA
2 School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
3 School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales; and School of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Correspondence Address:
Catrine Tudor-Locke
Department of Exercise and Wellness, Arizona State University East, Mesa, Arizona, USA

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Background: Walking for exercise is a purposeful or structured activity that can be captured relatively easily in surveys focused on leisure time activity. In contrast, walking for transport is an incidental activity that is likely to be missed using these same assessment approaches. Therefore, the purpose of this analysis was to utilize 1997 Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Time Use Survey diary data to describe nationally representative patterns of walking for transport and for exercise. Methods: Household members ≥ 15 years of age were recruited from over 4,550 randomly selected private dwellings in Australia. Time use diaries were collected for two designated days during all four seasons over the calendar year. 3,471 males and 3,776 females (94% household response rate and 84% person response rate) provided 14,315 diary days of data. The raw diary data were coded and summarized into bouts and minutes that included walking for transport and for exercise. Results: Walking for transport was indicated on a higher proportion of days compared to walking for exercise (20 vs 9%). Based on participant sub-samples ('doers'; those actually performing the activity) walking for transport was performed over 2.3 ± 1.4 bouts/day (12.5 minutes/bout) for a total of ≈28 mins/day and walking for exercise over 1.2 ± 0.5 bouts/day (47 minutes/bout) for a total of ≈56 mins/day. Conclusion: Although walking for transport is typically undertaken in multiple brief bouts, accumulated durations approximate public health guidelines for those who report any walking for transport.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2499    
    Printed199    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded65    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal