|
 |
| CASE REPORT |
|
| Year : 2014 | Volume
: 15
| Issue : 4 | Page : 124-126 |
|
|
Paradoxical coronary artery embolism - A rare cause of myocardial infarction
Fayaz A Hakim, Evan P Kransdorf, Muaz M Abudiab, John P Sweeney
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| Date of Web Publication | 9-Feb-2015 |
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Fayaz A Hakim
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine 13400 E Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, Arizona 85259
USA
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/1995-705X.151089
 Abstract | | |
Paradoxical coronary artery embolism is a rare, but often an underdiagnosed cause of acute myocardial infarction. It should be considered in patient who presents with chest pain and otherwise having a low risk profile for atherosclerosis coronary artery disease. We describe a case of paradoxical coronary artery embolism causing ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in a patient with upper extremity venous thrombosis. Echocardiography demonstrated a patent foramen ovale (PFO) with bidirectional shunt. In addition to treatment of acute coronary event closure of the PFO should be considered to prevent a recurrence. Keywords: Coronary artery, embolism, flush occlusion, myocardial infarction, paradoxical
How to cite this article:
Hakim FA, Kransdorf EP, Abudiab MM, Sweeney JP. Paradoxical coronary artery embolism - A rare cause of myocardial infarction. Heart Views 2014;15:124-6 |
How to cite this URL:
Hakim FA, Kransdorf EP, Abudiab MM, Sweeney JP. Paradoxical coronary artery embolism - A rare cause of myocardial infarction. Heart Views [serial online] 2014 [cited 2023 Sep 22];15:124-6. Available from: https://www.heartviews.org/text.asp?2014/15/4/124/151089 |
| Introduction | |  |
Coronary artery embolism is an established cause of acute coronary syndrome, but paradoxical coronary artery embolism causing myocardial infarction is rare and requires a high degree of clinical suspicion for diagnosis. Recognition of this condition is important as these patients are at risk of future fatal embolic phenomena. A search for venous thrombosis and underlying prothrombotic conditions should be undertaken. Percutaneous device closure of interatrial communication either in the form of patent foramen ovale (PFO) or atrial septal defect (ASD) should be considered to prevent future embolism.
| Case Report | | |
A 64-year-old male with multiple myeloma was admitted for autologous stem cell transplantation. Two weeks previous he was diagnosed with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-related right basilic and axillary vein thrombosis [[Figure 1]a, arrows] complicated by pulmonary embolism that was treated with low molecular weight heparin. | Figure 1: (a) Doppler ultrasound of axillary vein showing a thrombus. (b) Right coronary angiogram showing flush occlusion of posterior descending artery and posterolateral branch of right coronary artery. (c) Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with agitated saline showing bubbles crossing the patent foramen ovale (PFO). (d) TEE with Doppler study showing shunting across the PFO. (e) TEE showing a thrombus in superior vena cava
Click here to view |
During an attempt at PICC removal, the patient coughed and developed sudden severe left-sided chest pain. An electrocardiogram showed ST segment elevation in inferior (II, III, and aVF) leads. Cardiac biomarkers were elevated (Troponin-T 2.230 ng/ml (normal <0.01 ng/ml) and creatine kinase myocardial band fraction 65.1 ng/ml (normal <6.7 ng/ml)). Coronary angiography revealed flush occlusion of the posterior descending artery and posterolateral branch of the right coronary artery [[Figure 1]b, arrows]. Severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count 37 × 109/L) secondary to newly diagnosed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia precluded use of antiplatelet agents and hence, coronary intervention. Bivalirudin was initiated for anticoagulation.Chest pain and echocardiographic changes resolved.
Transesophageal echocardiography with agitated saline showed a small PFO ([Figure 1]c, arrow) with bidirectional shunt seen on color Doppler imaging [[Figure 1]d, asterix]. In addition, a large thrombus was seen in the superior vena cava [[Figure 1]e, arrow]. A diagnosis of ST elevation myocardial infarction secondary to paradoxical embolism to the right coronary artery was entertained.
In addition to long-term treatment with fondaparinux for venous thrombosis, percutaneous PFO closure was recommended to prevent recurrent embolism.
| Discussion | | |
Paradoxical coronary embolism is rare and accounts for 10-15%. [1] of all paradoxical emboli, and 25% of acute coronary events in patients less than 35 years of age. [2] Our patient had a documented PICC associated thrombus, and an episode of cough preceding the onset of chest pain caused transient elevation in right atrial pressure with right to left shunting and paradoxical embolism though a PFO. The Valsalva maneuver is routinely used to demonstrate shunting across the PFO during echocardiographic examination in individuals in whom spontaneous shunting is not seen.
Paradoxical embolism was first reported by Cohnheim in 1877 [3] and is known to cause cerebral, peripheral arterial, and in rare instances coronary artery occlusion. Paradoxical coronary artery embolism should be suspected in patients who otherwise are at low risk for atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. In a given clinical scenario, demonstration of venoarterial communication (most often at the atrial level) together with identification of a venous source of embolus and lack of thrombi in the left heart fulfill the criteria for presumptive diagnosis of this condition. [4] A definite diagnosis requires demonstration of thrombus across the venoarterial communication either by echocardiography or contrast computed tomographic angiography of the chest.
Many times paradoxical coronary artery embolism can only be made at the time of autopsy. When suspected clinically, a search for an underlying condition predisposing to venous thrombosis should be undertaken.
The management of acute coronary syndrome caused by paradoxical coronary artery embolism is similar to that occurring in the setting of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Manual aspiration thrombectomy with or without angioplasty and stenting followed by aggressive medical management including antiplatelet agents, is the standard of practice. Anticoagulation therapy should be started for established venous thrombosis. [5] The management of patients with contraindication to antiplatelet therapy may be challenging as in this case. Aspiration and manual thrombectomy should be the main therapeutic intervention in such a situation unless the embolus is distal in a small coronary artery.
Measures to prevent recurrence should be considered. Optimum therapeutic strategy in preventing recurrent embolic events in patients with PFO is not established. A recent meta-analysis of three randomized clinical trials addressing the role of transcutaneous closure of PFO showed a benefit in preventing recurrent cerebrovascular ischemic events in patients with cryptogenic stroke when compared with medical therapy. [6] Another study demonstrated lower recurrent neurological event rates with Amplatzer compared with CardioSeal-STARflex and Helex devices. [7] Although percutaneous device closure has not been studied in paradoxical coronary embolism, it should be considered to prevent fatal recurrent events.
In summary, paradoxical coronary embolism is a rare cause of acute coronary syndrome. Once suspected, careful transesophageal echocardiographic examination is important for presumptive diagnosis. In addition to acute management of acute coronary syndrome, PFO closure to prevent recurrent thromboembolism should be considered.
| References | | |
| 1. | Wachsman DE, Jacobs AK. Paradoxical coronary embolism: A rare cause of acute myocardial infarction. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2003;4:107-11.  |
| 2. | Velebit V, al-Tawil D. Myocardial infarct in a young man with angiographically normal coronary arteries and atrial septal defect. Med Arh 1999;53:33-6. |
| 3. | Cohnheim J. Thrombose und Embolie. In: Vorlesungen Über Allgemeine Pathologie. Berlin: Hirschwald; 1877. p. 134. |
| 4. | Johnson BI. Paradoxical embolism. J Clin Pathol 1951;4:316-32. |
| 5. | Wilson AM, Ardehali R, Brinton RJ, Yeung AC, Vagelos R. Successful removal of a paradoxical coronary embolus using an aspiration catheter. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2006;3:633-6. |
| 6. | Rengifo-Moreno P, Palacios IF, Junpaparp P, Witzke CF, Morris DL, Romero-Corral A. Patent foramen ovale transcatheter closure vs. medical therapy on recurrent vascular events: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J 2013;34:3342-52. |
| 7. | Hornung M, Bertog SC, Franke J, Id D, Taaffe M, Wunderlich N, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing three different devices for percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale. Eur Heart J 2013;34:3362-9. |
[Figure 1]
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Progressive Memory Decline in a Patient With Atrial Septal Defect: Case Report and Literature Review |
|
| Yaw Amo Wiafe, Gordon Manu Amponsah, George Asafu Adjaye Frimpong, Isaac Kofi Owusu | | Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports. 2023; 16: 1179547623 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
Embolic myocardial infarction associated with patent foramen ovale: a case series |
|
| A. M. Pivtsova, D. Yu. Shchekochikhin, D. V. Ognerubov, A. A. Agadzhanyan, A. A. Bogdanova, M. I. Makeev, D. V. Pevzner, ?. V. Merkulov, D. A. Andreev, M. Yu. Gilyarov | | Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2023; 22(1): 3352 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 3 |
Myocardial Infarction Due to Paradoxical Thromboembolism Originating From Distal Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis (LEDVT) |
|
| Meagan Josephs, D. Juliet Benonaih-Jumbo, Thanushiya Jeyakanthan | | Cureus. 2023; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 4 |
Recurrent Episodes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Secondary to Paradoxical Coronary Artery Embolism |
|
| Mita Singh, Ana Teresa Gomes, Paul Hill, Ansuman Saha | | Cardiogenetics. 2022; 12(3): 246 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 5 |
Paradoxes in embolism: management of a young female patient with atrial septal defect after acute myocardial infarction |
|
| N. V. Chumachenko, N. V. Kijvatova, H. D. Kosmacheva, A. N. Pakholkov, A. N. Fedorchenko | | South Russian Journal of Therapeutic Practice. 2022; 3(3): 91 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 6 |
Paradoxical coronary artery embolisation: an unusual cause of myocardial infarction |
|
| Bernard Borg, Lisa L Buttigieg, Caroline J Magri | | British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2022; : 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 7 |
Paradoxical embolism through patent foramen ovale as a cause of myocardial infarction |
|
| Naim Mridha,Eloise Ward,Samual Hayman,Arun Dahiya,Sandhir Prasad | | Medical Journal of Australia. 2021; 215(2): 68 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 8 |
High prevalence of inferior ST-segment elevation in pulmonary embolism-related paradoxical embolism |
|
| O M P Jolobe | | QJM: An International Journal of Medicine. 2020; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 9 |
Patent foramen ovale and paradoxical coronary artery embolism: rare event with great clinical relevance |
|
| Claudia Morabito,Michele Scarano,Eugenio Genovesi,Vittoria Vaccaro,Giulia Laterra,Pasquale Crea,Giuseppe Dattilo,Matteo Casale | | Cor et Vasa. 2020; 62(3): 332 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 10 |
Patent foramen ovale, paradoxical embolism and fatal coronary obstruction |
|
| Danica Cvetkovic,Vladimir Živkovic,Slobodan Nikolic | | Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology. 2018; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 11 |
Unique Presentations and Etiologies of Myocardial Infarction in Women |
|
| Marysia S. Tweet,Patricia Best,Sharonne N. Hayes | | Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2017; 19(9) | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 12 |
Paradoxical coronary artery embolism due to patent foramen ovale |
|
| Mustafa Aparci,Omer Uz,Murat Atalay,Ejder Kardesoglu | | International Journal of Cardiology. 2016; 209: 164 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 13 |
Paradoxical coronary embolism as a cause of non-atherosclerotic acute coronary syndrome |
|
| Hamza Duygu | | International Journal of Cardiology. 2015; 191: 225 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 14 |
All that glitters ainæt gold! A case of embolic STEMI demonstrated by OCT |
|
| Mario Iannaccone,Antonio Montefusco,Pierluigi Omedeæ,Fabrizio Dæascenzo,Claudio Moretti | | International Journal of Cardiology. 2015; 196: 14 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
 |
|
|
|
