Intracoronary stenting of sponraenous left main coronary artery dissection using drug-eluting stent :Prashanth Panduranga, Mohammed K Mukhaini, Heart Views

CASE REPORT
Year : 2006 | Volume : 7 | Issue : 4 | Page : 146--149

Intracoronary stenting of sponraenous left main coronary artery dissection using drug-eluting stent

Prashanth Panduranga¹, Mohammed K Mukhaini²,
¹ Specialist Cardiologist, Department of Cardiology, Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman
² Consultant Cardiologist, Department of Cardiology, Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman

Correspondence Address:
Prashanth Panduranga
Specialist Cardiologist, Department of Cardiology, Royal Hospital, Muscat-111
Oman

How to cite this article:
Panduranga P, Mukhaini MK. Intracoronary stenting of sponraenous left main coronary artery dissection using drug-eluting stent.Heart Views 2006;7:146-149

How to cite this URL:
Panduranga P, Mukhaini MK. Intracoronary stenting of sponraenous left main coronary artery dissection using drug-eluting stent. Heart Views [serial online] 2006 [cited 2023 Dec 8 ];7:146-149
Available from: https://www.heartviews.org/text.asp?2006/7/4/146/63898

Full Text

Introduction

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is rare. Only 224 cases have been reported in the literature [1] . It is the result of an intimal tear and intramural hematoma in the media of the arterial wall that creates a false lumen. Expansion of this lumen through blood or clot accumulation along with dissection flap leads to compression of the true lumen and myocardial ischemia presenting as acute coronary syndromes or sudden death. We present a case of SCAD treated with drug eluting stent.

Case Presentation

A 25-year Omani lady presented to our emergency department with a history of prolonged retrosternal chest pain radiating to the left arm. The pain started at rest and lasted about 30 min. The pain was associated with vomiting and brief syncopal episode. She has no history of any coronary risk factors, nor had she used oral contraceptive pills or illicit drugs. Physical examination revealed a blood pressure of 105/72 mmHg, a pulse rate of 80/minute and normal cardiovascular examination. Initial ECG showed sinus rhythm with transient 1 mm ST elevation in V1-V3, I, AVL followed by normalization of ST with minor T inversion in V1-V6 and AVL. Troponin I was positive at 1.83 ng/ml (normal range [2],[3] . The majority of cases, about 70-75% [2],[4] are diagnosed post-mortem. Mortality is due to sudden death in 50% of cases. Twenty percent (20%) die in the hours following the dissection 5. In those surviving the initial event, the survival rate is reported to be 82% [4] .

SCAD is the result of an intimal tear and intramural hematoma in the media of the arterial wall that creates a false lumen. Expansion of this lumen through blood or clot accumulation along with dissection flap leads to compression of the true lumen and myocardial ischemia presenting as acute coronary syndromes or sudden death.

Most reports novolve apparently healthy, young to middle aged women (78%; mean age 40 years) without overt risk for coronary artery disease and without severe coronary atheromatosis2. One-third of women with SCAD are in the peripartum state [1] .

The etiology is poorly defined, but many studies have identified 3 types of risk factors, namely atherosclerotic disease, pregnancy or peri-partum period and an idiopathic cause [1],[2],[4] . SCAD has also been associated with oral contraceptive ingestion, cocaine use, blunt trauma, Marfan's syndrome, cystic medical necrosis, hypersensitivity vasculitis, coronary spasm, hypertension, fibromuscular dysplasia, after intense physical exercise and autoimmune thyroiditis [1],[6] .

The condition is generally discovered on coronary angiography, which may reveal dissections in single or multiple coronary arteries with or without left main coronary artery involvement. Men are more likely to have SCAD in the right coronary artery system than women (50.8 versus 13.0%), whereas women had a higher proportion of LAD artery involvement (46.6 versus 25.4%) and left main artery involvement (14.9 versus 3.2%). The circumflex artery was infrequently involved in men and women [1] .

The angiogram may show narrowing or compression of coronary arteries with decreased diameters and compromised coronary blood flow which may range from TIMI 0-3. Dissection flaps may or may not be seen6. When seen, double lumen may be noted with contrast staining of false lumen. IVUS has been used to diagnose and assess SCAD [7],[13] .

Treatment strategy in SCAD is on a case-by-case basis and based on clinical and angiography results. Medical treatment can be considered in asymptomatic patients [2],[5],[8] . Medical treatment includes antiplatelet treatment with aspirin and clopidrogel to prevent platelet-rich thrombus formation. There are few data on the use of low molecular weight heparin or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors [8],[9],[10] . Thrombolytic agents were used in the past [2] , but are contraindicated as they may worsen the dissection process. Beta Blockers are also used for their effects on heart rate, coronary blood flow, and vessel wall shear stress.

Percutaneous intervention has been increasingly performed for SCAD depending upon location and extent of dissection. In the absence of severe LV impairment, symptomatic patients with single vessel dissection not involving the left main coronary artery have benefited from primary coronary stenting [11],[12] . The deployment of a stent tacks back the dissection flap but very long stents may be necessary when the dissection flap is extensive, although the use of drug eluting stents may reduce this concern as in our case. Recently there was a report on the use of drug-eluting stents in SCAD deployed in the LAD [13] .

CABG is generally recommended as first-line treatment when several coronary vessels are involved [4],[5],[14] and in left main stem dissection[15]. But in our case as there was a long dissection starting from the left main with extension to mid LAD we went ahead with stenting of left main and LAD dissection with excellent final results. CABG was also an option but there was a high chance of propagation of this dissection to the distal LAD, hence to limit the dissection immediate stenting was considered the first choice of management.

Conclusion

In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, this is the only case report describing intracoronary drug eluting stent implantation of spontaneous left main dissection in a young patient with acute coronary syndrome. This report supports the proposition that percutaneous coronary intervention with use of drug eluting stents must be the treatment of choice for single vessel dissection. Patients with multivessel dissection should go for coronary artery bypass grafting.

References

1	Ellen AT, SueEllen Ferraris, Todd Gress, Victor Ferraris. Gender differences and predictors of mortality in spontaneous coronary artery dissection: A review of reported cases. J of Invasive Cardiology 2005; 17(1):59-61.
2	Jorgensen MB, Aharonian V, Mansukhani P, Mahrer PR. Spontaneous coronary dissection: a cluster of cases with this rare finding. Am Heart J. 1994;127:1382-1387
3	Nishikawa H, Nakanishi S, Nishiyama S, et al. Primary coronary artery dissection observed at coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 1988; 61:645-648.
4	DeMaio SJ, Kinsella SH, Silverman ME. Clinical course and long term prognosis of spontaneous coronary dissection. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64:471-474.
5	Zampieri P, Aggio S, Roncon L. Follow up after spnontaneous coronary artery dissection: a report of five cases. Heart. 1996; 75:206-209.
6	Oguz Y, Azem A, Fatih I. Spontaneous dissection and Intramural haematoma of the coronary arteries without angiographic flap. J of Invasive Cardiology 2005; 17:556-558.
7	Maehara A, Mintz GS, Castagna MT, et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of a spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 89:466-468
8	Sarmento-Leite R, Machado PR, Garcia SL. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: Stent it or wait for healing? Heart. 2003; 89:164.
9	R Butler, M W I Webster, G Davies, Spontaneous dissection of native coronary arteries. Heart 2005; 91:223-224.
10	Cheung S, Mithani V, Watson RM. Healing of spontaneous coronary dissection in the context of glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibitor therapy: A case report. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 51:95-100.
11	Carrascosa Porras M, Ares MA, Zucco J. Intracoronary stenting for postpartum coronary artery dissection. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128:873.
12	Hong MK, Satler LF, mintz GS. Treatment of spontaneous coronary artery dissection with intracoronary stenting. Am Heart J 1996; 132:200-202.
13	Porto I, Banning AP, Intravascular ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of spontaneous coronary dissection with drug-eluting stents. J of Invasive Cardiology 2004; 16(2):78-80.
14	Cohen DE, Strimike CL. A case of multiple spontaneous coronary artery dissections. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 49:318-320.
15	Thistlewaite PA. Surgical management of spontaneous left main coronary artery dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 45:258-60.